Amendment to banking regulation act

Highlights of the Bill

Key Issues and Analysis

PART A: HIGHLIGHTS OF THE BILL

Context

The banking sector in India consists of scheduled commercial banks, regional rural banks, small finance banks and co-operative banks. Co-operative banks provide banking facilities to persons of small means thereby fulfilling the objective of financial inclusion. [1] As of 2015, nearly 90% of loans made by co-operative banks were of less than five lakh rupees each, accounting for 33% of total lending by these banks. Co-operative banks are those co-operative societies whose principal business is banking. These societies are owned, promoted, controlled and managed by their members and seek to provide support to them.

As per the Constitution, states can legislate on the incorporation, regulation and winding up of co-operative societies. [2] States regulate co-operative societies under their respective Co-operative Societies Acts, through the Registrar of Co-operative Societies (RCS). In 1965, certain provisions of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (BR Act) were made applicable to co-operative banks. [3] This gave Reserve Bank of India (RBI) some powers to regulate co-operative banks. This was done to protect the interests of depositors and extend deposit insurance coverage to these banks.

RBI regulates state co-operative banks, district (central) co-operative banks and primary co-operative banks (also called urban co-operative banks). It regulates banking-related activities of these banks such as issuance of licenses for new banks/branches and investment and loan policies. RBI also prescribes norms for capital adequacy, asset classification, liquidity requirements and exposure norms. [4] The RCS in each state regulates incorporation, registration, management, recovery, audit, supersession of Board of Directors and liquidation of co-operative societies registered with it.

The Banking Regulation (Amendment) Bill, 2020 amends the BR Act to expand RBI’s regulatory control over co-operative banks in terms of management, capital, audit and liquidation. The Bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on September 14, 2020. While introducing the Bill, the Finance Minister discussed the need for the Bill to protect depositors’ interest, highlighting the crisis in the Punjab and Maharashtra Co-operative (PMC) Bank. The Bill replaces the Banking Regulation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020 promulgated on June 26, 2020.[5] A Bill, seeking to make similar changes, was introduced on March 3, 2020 and withdrawn on September 14. [6]

The Bill makes two kinds of changes: (i) extending previously omitted provisions of the BR Act to co-operative banks, and (ii) amendments to certain provisions of the Act that apply to all banks.

Co-operative Banks

Formulation of scheme for reconstruction or amalgamation without moratorium

PART B: KEY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS

Role of co-operative banks

In a discussion paper on the Banking Structure in India (2013), RBI envisioned a four-tier structure for banks, consisting of international, national, regional and local banks. [7] The fourth tier of local area banks and co-operative banks were envisioned to serve the credit requirements of small borrowers. Urban co-operative banks (UCBs) cater to the financial needs of the local community, serving persons belonging to lower income groups in urban and semi-urban areas. RBI (2013) had considered the commercialization of UCBs by converting them into local area banks. However, they observed the importance of the cooperative spirit in the banking sector in channelling credit to people of small means. The High Powered Committee (HPC) on UCBs, in 2015 recommended that RBI issue fresh licenses to UCBs to serve in unbanked/ underbanked districts, noting the role these banks play in facilitating financial inclusion.

However, RBI (2013) had also noted that UCBs have performed poorly due to challenges such as low capital base, lack of sources to raise capital (UCBs raise equity capital only from members), poor credit management and lack of professional management. 6 The 2013 paper had suggested that converting UCBs into local area banks to free them from dual control (of RBI and RCS) and improve their ability to raise capital could improve their performance. Several RBI reports have highlighted the absence of certain regulatory and supervisory powers of RBI over UCBs as one of the reasons for their poor performance. [8] , [9] ,1

While RBI regulates licensing and loan policy, prescribes prudential norms and conducts inspection of UCBs, it requires the assistance of RCS to act against the management, or undertake restructuring or liquidation of these banks. For effective regulation of UCBs, the HPC (2015) had suggested that RBI be given powers to constitute and supersede the Board of Directors, remove the Chairman, conduct audits, and wind up UCBs. RBI exercises these powers with regard to all other banks regulated under the BR Act. The Bill empowers RBI to exercise control over co-operative banks in terms of management, capital, audit and winding up.

Note that such additional powers may increase pressure on the supervisory capacity of RBI. Currently, RBI regulates and supervises 86 scheduled commercial banks, 45 regional rural banks and 10 small finance banks. The Bill extends RBI’s regulation and supervision to 1,544 UCBs, 363 district (central) co-operative banks and 33 state co-operative banks.

Legislative competence of Parliament

Through the Bill, Parliament extends RBI’s regulation of co-operative banks to cover matters pertaining to the management, capital, audit and winding up of such banks. The question is whether Parliament has the jurisdiction to legislate on these matters for co-operative banks. These entities are registered as co-operative societies under various state Co-operative Societies Acts and perform the activity of banking.

Parliament has the power to legislate on ‘banking’ through entry 45 of the Union List in the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution. Matters pertaining to ‘incorporation, regulation and winding up’ of co-operative societies are covered under entry 32 of the State List. Further, entry 43 of the Union List excludes from the purview of Parliament, matters pertaining to incorporation, regulation and winding up of co-operative societies.

A question may be raised about whether regulation of management, capital, audit and winding up is essential to regulating ‘banking’ and therefore falls within the purview of entry 45 of the Union List, or whether it is primarily related to ‘incorporation, regulation and winding up’ of a co-operative society under entry 32 of the State List. When co-operative banks were brought under the purview of the BR Act in 1965, provisions related either directly or indirectly to the incorporation, management and winding up of co-operative banks were omitted. [10] The Statement of Object and Reasons of that Bill noted that these provisions are not in pith and substance within the scope of any entry (including ‘banking’) in the Union or Concurrent List. 9

A recent judgement of a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court may be relevant. [11] It considered whether Parliament had the jurisdiction to allow co-operative banks to recover debt under SARFAESI Act, 2002. It held that recovery of debt was an essential facet of ‘banking’ and therefore it is within the purview of Parliament to enable co-operative banks to recover debt under the SARFAESI Act. The judgement noted that a co-operative bank’s entire operation and activity of banking are governed by the BR Act. As banking in pith and substance is covered under entry 45, incidental trenching upon a subject reserved for states (entry 32) is permissible. It added that on matters of ‘incorporation, regulation and winding up’ which are unrelated to entry 45 of the Union List, co-operative banks will be governed by state legislation. Therefore, the question is whether regulation of management, audit, capital and winding up are essential to the activity of banking and the operation of a (co-operative) bank, and thus, whether the Bill falls within the legislative competence of Parliament.

Provisions on capital may violate principles of co-operative societies

Treatment and rights of equity capital raised from the public is unclear

The Bill enables co-operative banks to issue (with prior approval from RBI) equity, preference or special shares, at face value or at a premium by way of public issue or private placement. Co-operative societies are set up on the principle of member control with (equity) shares issued to members. Since co-operative societies raise capital from members, it is unclear what it means to raise equity capital from the public, how it will be treated and regulated. Further, issuance of equity shares may violate principles of co-operative societies if they carry proportional voting rights. Co-operative societies grant voting rights only to members based on the principle of ‘one member one vote’ irrespective of shareholding. Note that the Vishwanathan Committee (2006), set up to study ways to augment capital of UCBs, recommended issuance of preference and special shares, both of which would be non-voting. [12]

Restriction on demanding payment against the surrender of shares by members may limit exit options

The Bill prohibits members from demanding payment against the surrender of their share capital. This may contravene provisions contained in certain Co-operative Societies Acts. The Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, for example, provides for refund of shares to a member if there are no outstanding dues. [13] This provision of the Bill raises concerns for existing members of co-operative societies whose option to exit by surrendering their share capital will be restricted.

[2] . Entry 32, List II, Schedule VII.